Anandrao Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Rane * 1/2 * Monday, 25.9.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2017 Anandrao Patil ....Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

....Respondents ALONGWITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1437 OF 2017 Anandrao Patil ....Petitioner V/s.

1. Annasaheb R. Majare and Ors.

....Respondents * * * * * Mr. N.V. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner in both the petitions.

Mr. F.R. Shaikh, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Mr. S.P. Kadam i/by. Mr. Yogesh Patil, Advocate for respondent no.2.

CORAM :- CORAM :- R.M. SAVANT & R.M. SAVANT & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2017.

25TH SEPTEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :- P.C. :-

Rane * 2/2 * Monday, 25.9.2017 1.

Having regard to the fact that the investigation into FIR No. 77 of 2017 and FIR No. 78 of 2017 lodged by the respondent no.2 and the petitioner respectively is going on, there is no warrant to interfere in the writ jurisdiction of this Court at this stage. We are, therefore, not in a position to consider the prayer that no case for offences punishable under Sections 341, 143, 147, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner.

2.

It would be contingent upon the final report that the police would file, that the petitioner can take appropriate recourse in law. With the observations as aforesaid, the writ petitions are disposed of. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J)