Sandeep Steels v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

1/2 926.6.wp-1470-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1470 OF 2018 Sandeep Steels

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

----- Mr. Siddharth Murarka a/w. Mr.Devendra Tiwari I/b. Law Chamber of Siddharth Murarka for the Petitioner.

Mr.A.R.Patil, APP for the Respondent - State. Mr.Mikadad Aziz Zummerwala i/b. Mrs.Poonam Ankleshwaria for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

----- CORAM : S.S. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 6th SEPTEMBER 2019 P.C.:

1.

Learned Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 i.e., contesting respondents, submits that respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are acquitted by the trial Court.

2.

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner concedes to the position that contesting respondents are acquitted by the trial Court. He submits that in view of acquittal of the contesting respondents by the trial Court, this petition has become infructuous except question of law raised in the petition.

Trupti

2/2 926.6.wp-1470-2018.doc 3.

In view of the subsequent events occurred after filing the petition has rendered infructuous on merits. So far question of law, if any, involved in the petition can be argued in other connected petitions. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (S.S. SHINDE, J.) Trupti