Arun Digambar Kulkarni v. Directorate Of Enforcement

29. WP 2041-2022.doc by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date:

2022.07.04 15:10:35 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2041 OF 2022 Arun Digambar Kulkarni

...Petitioner

Versus

Directorate of Enforcement

...Respondent

Mrs. Pushpa Ganediwala i/b Mr. R.P.Mali for the Petitioner. Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Shraddha Achliya, Jatin Pore, Ms. Ankita Agrawal and Gaurav Suryawanshi i/b DSK Legal for Respondent Nos.2,3 and 4.

Mr. V.B.Konde Deshmukh, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & V. G. BISHT, JJ.

DATE : 30 th JUNE, 2022 P.C. :

1.

In view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned Counsel appearing for the respective respondents that the aforesaid Writ Petition is not maintainable, as it is in the nature of a PIL, learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the Wakodikar 1/2

29. WP 2041-2022.doc petitioner will file an appropriate petition i.e. PIL. Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

2.

Needless to state, that it always open for the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings, in accordance with law. V. G. BISHT, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar 2/2