← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3395/2020disposed off

Shri. Pandurang Vishnu Jadhav v. Mahalaxmi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Mydt, Hupari. Thr. Its Sectary Prakash S. Deshpande

2023-03-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3395 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 5010 OF 2020 Shri. Pandurang Vishnu Jadhav ...Applicant

Versus

Mahalaxmi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit, Hupari, through its Secretary, Prakash S. Deshpande ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3360 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 4315 OF 2020 Sou. Kavita Ashok Tanwani ...Applicant

Versus

Mahalaxmi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit, Hupari, through its Secretary, Prakash S. Deshpande ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3362 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 4314 OF 2020 Shri. Ashok Baburao Tanwani ...Applicant

Versus

Mahalaxmi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit, Hupari, through its Secretary, Prakash S. Deshpande ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3364 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 4312 OF 2020 1/3

Shri. Bharat Shankar Gat ...Applicant

Versus

Mahalaxmi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit, Hupari, through its Secretary, Prakash S. Deshpande ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3436 OF 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 5132 OF 2020 Ravsaheb M. Mali (deceased) through legal heirs Sonabai M. Mali(deceased) through legal heirs Mangal R. Mali ...Applicant

Versus

Mahalaxmi Mahila Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit, Hupari, through its Secretary, Prakash S. Deshpande ...Respondent Mr. Manoj Patil, for the Applicants.

Mr. V. S. Ingrole, for the Respondents.

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 13th MARCH, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and Mr. Ingrole, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.

2.

Mr. Ingrole, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents strongly opposes the Interim Applications. 3.

However, for the reasons set out in the Interim 2/3

Applications, the same are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

4.

The Interim Applications are disposed of in above terms with no order as to costs.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] 3/3