Gorakh Tulsiram Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra

7. cri wp 1410­14.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1410 OF 2014 Gorakh Tulsiram Jadhav ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ...................

Appearances Ms. Rohini Dandekar Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 16, 2016.

ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :

1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The prayer of the petitioner is for remission of his sentence.

jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

7. cri wp 1410­14.doc 4.

Learned APP has produced the report of the Superintendent of Nasik Road Central Prison wherein the petitioner was lodged. The said report is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The report shows that the petitioner has expired. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition, hence, rule is discharged. [ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2