Amirali Hassanali Matcheswala And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

4.apl-400-17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.400 OF 2017 Amirali Hassanali Matcheswala and another .... Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another .... Respondents ....

Mr. Sushil Matkar, Advocate a/w. Ms. Rutil Shetty i/b. Corpslegal, for the Applicants.

Ms. M.H. Mhatre, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Rahul Tiwari, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ....

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 24 NOVEMBER 2021 P.C.

Having expressed that considering the facts of the case where the son of the informant had expired due to the incident alleged and considering opposition of the State that this is not a case where the FIR can be quashed by consent and the Application is based solely on the consent of Respondent No.2, the learned counsel for the Applicants states that liberty be granted to withdraw Criminal Application as the Applicants intend to seek quashing of the FIR on merits.

PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE 2.

Criminal Application is accordingly disposed of as PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2021.11.24 18:26:14 +0530 withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Deshmane (PS) 1 / 1