Varsha Dipak Kadbane v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And ORS.
TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION TAUSEEF LAIQUEE FAROOQUI Date: 2024.03.26 12:33:44 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.4310 OF 2024 Sagar Arjun Sawale & Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4311 OF 2024 Rohan Chandrakant Gaikwad
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4312 OF 2024 Swapnil Dattatray Palande & Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4313 OF 2024 Varsha Dipak Kadbane
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4314 OF 2024 Dhananjay Dinkar Dabhade & Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4315 OF 2024 Sarika Anil Jagtap & Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4317 OF 2024 Shrikant Tukaram Sakore
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary & Ors.
...Respondents
__________ Mr. Laxman S. Deshmukh for the Petitioner in WP/4310/2024. Mr. Sandeep Dere a/w. Mrs. Arati Patil-Dere for the Petitioner in WP/4311/2024, WP/4312/2024, 4313/2024, 4314/2024, 4315/2024 & 4317/2024.
Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. G. P. a/w. Mr. T. N. Bhatia, AGP for RespondentState in WP/4310/2024. Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl. G. P. a/w. Ms. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4311/2024, WP/4312/2024, WP/4313/2024, WP/4314/2024, WP/4315/2024.
Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl. G. P. a/w. Mr. M. M. Pable, AGP for Respondent-State in WP/4317/2024.
__________ CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 22nd MARCH 2024 P.C.:
1.
In all these Writ Petitions, the Petitioners have challenged the interim order dated 11th March 2024, passed in the respective Original
Applications before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (for short "Tribunal").
2.
Mr. Dere, learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, submits that pursuant to the impugned orders, the Petitioners have joined the place of transfer. He, however, submits that after the order dated 11th March 2024 was passed by the learned Member, the Tribunal at Aurangabad has decided Original Application No.240 of 2024 and has set aside the common transfer order dated 26th February 2024, insofar as the applicant therein is concerned. He, therefore, seeks leave to pursue the Original Applications before the Tribunal by bringing these facts on record.
3.
Since the Petitioners have joined at the place of transfer, it is not necessary to go into the correctness of the order dated 11th March 2024. Instead the following directions would serve the ends of justice:- (i) Each Petitioner is at liberty to file an Additional Affidavit and place on record subsequent events including the passing of the order dated 21st March 2024 by the Tribunal at Aurangabad.
(ii) The Respondents are also at liberty to file Additional Affidavits.
(iii)The Tribunal shall consider the Original Applications on
their own merits and decides the same expeditiously in accordance with law.
(iv)All points raised are kept open for being urged before the Tribunal.
(v) The Petitioners are at liberty to circulate the Original Applications prior to the next date of the proceedings. (vi)All the Writ Petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.)