Kanwarjitsingh Rabindrpal Sehgal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

APPP. 359, 372 -18.doc VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 359 OF 2018 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 362 OF 2018 Kanwarjitsingh Rabindrapal Sehgal ...

Applicant In the matter between :

Mrs. Sarika Rajendra Sharma & Anr.

...

Applicants Vs.

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 372 OF 2018 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION No. 609 OF 2018 Kanwarjitsingh Rabindrapal Sehgal ...

Applicant In the matter between :

Pramod Fulchand Patni ...

Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent *** Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat, for accused / applicant in ABA. 609/2018. Mr. Abhishek Pungliya, for the accused / applicants in ABA. 362/2018 Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent - State. Mr.Sujay Kantawala a/w Kartik Vig i/b Brijesh Pathak, for Intervenor / original complainant / Applicant. *** 1 / 2

APPP. 359, 372 -18.doc CORAM : P. N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : APRIL 3, 2018 PC :- 1.

Issue notice to Respondents. Learned APP waives notice for Respondent-State and learned counsel Mr. Abhishek Pungliya and Mr. Pradeep J. Thorat waive notice for original accused in the respective anticipatory bail application.

2.

Both the applications are filed by original complainant for intervention in the anticipatory bail applications. Learned counsel for applicant / original accused seek time to go through the documents filed in support of the applications. Learned counsel for Applicant / original complainant submits that he is not relying upon the documents which are filed with the applications. In that view of the matter, no case is made out for grant of time, and considering the grounds mentioned in the applications, both applications are allowed. Applicant is allowed to assist the prosecution. Applications are accordingly disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a). Sd/- [P. N. DESHMUKH, J.] Vinayak Halemath 2 / 2