Vikas Baban Payagude v. State Of Maharashtra

1/2 2-ba.861.2017.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.861 OF 2017 Vikas Baban Payagude ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms.P.P.Kakade, for the Applicant.

Ms.R.M.Gadhvi, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 9th JANUARY, 2018 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP submits that charge has been framed in the said case and that witnesses have been summoned. 2.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application and instead prays that the trial of the applicant be expedited.

3.

This is the second bail application preferred by the applicant.

2/2 2-ba.861.2017.doc The first bail application of the applicant was rejected on merits by this Court, vide order dated 10th March, 2016 passed in Bail Application No.2008 of 2015. Admittedly, the trial has commenced. 4.

Learned Counsel for the applicant does not press this application on merits, as trial has commenced. 5.

As the trial has commenced, the same is expedited. The learned Judge to dispose of the case, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within 12 months from the date of receipt of this order. 6.

Application is accordingly disposed of on the aforesaid terms. 7.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.