Mrs. Shobha Raju @ Ravindra Jadhav v. Mr. Raju @ Ravindra Jadhav
FCA.208.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.104 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.208 OF 2013 Mrs.Shobha Raju @ Ravindra Jadhav Applicant versus Raju @ Ravindra Jadhav Respondent Ms.Seema Sarnaik for Applicant.
Mr.Pravartak Pathak for Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND P.D.NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 20th April 2016 PC :
Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned counsel for the Respondent. The appeal preferred by the Applicant for challenging the decree of divorce has been admitted. The appeal is filed within limitation. Hence, interim relief in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) will have to be granted. Accordingly, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(P.D.NAIK, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.) MST
FCA.208.2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.208 OF 2013 Mrs.Shobha Raju @ Ravindra Jadhav Appellant versus Raju @ Ravindra Jadhav Respondent Ms.Seema Sarnaik for Appellant.
Mr.Pravartak Pathak for Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND P.D.NAIK, JJ.
DATE : 20th April 2016 PC :
Reply shall be filed on or before 18th May 2016. List the application for hearing on 22nd June 2016.
(P.D.NAIK, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.) MST