← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/393/2008dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Jayshree Laljibhai Mistry v. Chandrakant @ Chandubhai Jivan Kalelia And ORS.

2023-04-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak2 pages

2. Apeal 392 of 2008.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 392 OF 2008 Laljibhai Gordhanbhai Mistry ...Appellant vs.

Chandrakant @ Chandubhai Jivan Kalelia and Ors.

...Respondents

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 393 OF 2008 Jayshree Laljibhai Mistry ...Appellant vs.

Chandrakant @ Chandubhai Jivan Kalelia and Ors.

...Respondents

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 394 OF 2008 Jayshree Laljibhai Mistry ...Appellant vs.

Chandrakant @ Chandubhai Jivan Kalelia and Ors.

...Respondents

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2008 Sumangla P. Damle ...Appellant vs.

Chandrakant @ Chandubhai Jivan Kalelia and Ors.

...Respondents

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 396 OF 2008 Laljibhai Gordhanbhai Mistry ...Appellant vs.

Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2023.04.27 15:16:14 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

2. Apeal 392 of 2008.doc Vijay Gordhanbhai Kalelia and Anr.

...Respondents

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2008 Vipul Laljibhai Mistry ...Appellant vs.

Vijay Gordhanbhai Kalelia and Anr.

...Respondents

***** None for Appellant in all appeals Mr. Omkar Nagvekar i/by Mr. M. K. Kocharekar - Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

Mr. Y. Y. Dabke - APP for the State.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

24th APRIL, 2023 P. C. :- 1.

Today no one is present on behalf of the Appellants. These six appeals are filed by different Appellants but Respondent is the same. Similar is the situation on 15/12/2022, 05/01/2023, 02/02/2023, 28/02/2023, 28/03/2023 and today also. All these appeals are fixed for dismissal.

2.

It seems that the Appellants have lost interest, hence all Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2