← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5116/2022disposed off

Pathan Parvex Khan Sultan Khan v. State Of Maharshtra Thr The Secretary Cooperation Dept And ORS

2023-04-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil2 pages

11.wp.5116.2022.doc Rajeshri Aher

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5116 OF 2022 Pathan Parvez Khan Sultan Khan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra Thr. The Secretary Co-operation Dept. and Ors.

...Respondents

....

Mr. Siddhesh Pilankar i/b Vaishnavi Gujarathi, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. K.N. Solunke, AGP for State/Respondent Nos. 1 to 4. Mr. Patik Rahade i/b Pramod Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No.5. ....

CORAM

:K. R. SHRIRAM & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATED :20th April 2023 P.C.:

Mr. Rahade for Respondent No.5, at the outset, states that Petitioner is a habitual complainant and this Petition is another attempt to harass Respondent No.5. Mr. Pilankar for Petitioner disagrees with Mr. Rahade and states that there is even a report annexed to the Petition issued by Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Chandwad, who is Respondent No.4 making certain damaging observations against Respondent No.5.

Ms. Solunke for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 states that the representation dated 23rd October 2021 and 12th January 2022 that Petitioner has filed before Respondent No.4 will be disposed by 30th Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:

2023.04.24 19:14:43 +0530 RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER June, 2023.

1/2

11.wp.5116.2022.doc Petitioner as well as Respondent No.5 shall be given a personal hearing before Respondent No.4 passes any order. Notice of Personal hearing shall be communicated at least five working days in advance.

Petition disposed.

We have not made any observations on the merits of the matter.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.) 2/2