← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/664/2015disposed off

Mrs. Tabbssum Asgar Ali Sayyed v. M/S. Darshan Developers Pvt. Ltd. And ORS

2016-11-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni2 pages

(24) AO 664-15 Amk

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER 664 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 814 OF 2015 Mrs. Tabbssum Asgar Ali Sayyed .. Appellant Vs.

M/s. Darshan Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

.. Respondents None for the Appellant.

Mr. Madhur S. Surana for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 15 th NOVEMBER, 2016.

P. C. :

1.

This appeal was called out in the morning session. None appeared for the appellant. Again in the second session when it is called out, none appears for the appellant. Mr. Surana appears for the respondent No.1. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute this appeal as evident from the absence of the appellant when called out at both sessions.

2.

In any case, the challenge raised in the appeal against an order dated 27.03.2015 passed in Notice of Motion No. 873 of 2015 in S. C. Suit No. 534 of 2015 refusing ad interim relief. The Notice of Motion appears to be pending disposal before the City Civil Court at (Borivali Division) Dindoshi, Goregaon, Mumbai. Perusal of the impugned order indicates that the learned Judge has come to prima facie conclusion that 1/2

(24) AO 664-15 the appellant is not entitled for the ad interim relief as prayed in the Notice of Motion. The order is a reasoned order. Further no protection is granted by this Court after filing of this Appeal. In these circumstances, the appeal need not be kept pending. It would be appropriate that the learned Trial Judge hears and decides the said Notice of Motion. 2.

All contentions of the parties on merits of the matter are kept open.

3.

The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

4.

Needless to observe that the learned Trial Judge shall decide the Notice of Motion on its own merits without being influenced by the observations made in the ad interim order passed in the Notice of Motion. 5.

In view of the disposal of the appeal, civil application No. 814 of 2015 does not survive and stands disposed of. [G. S. KULKARNI, J.] 2/2