Dnyanesh Trimbak Rahane v. The Nashik Municipal Corporation And ANR.

224-WP-3492-2002.DOC Jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3492 OF 2002 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 484 OF 2003 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3494 OF 2002 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3495 OF 2002 Dnyaneshwar Trimbak Rahanae

...Petitioner

Versus

The Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors.

...Respondents

Ms. Madhura Deshmukh, i/b Mr. Shriram S. Kulkarni, for the Petitioner / Applicant.

Mr. Shekhar Jagtap, i/b J. Shekhar & Co. for the Respondent No.1.

Mr. Manish M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent No.2.

CORAM:

A.S. OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED:

10th August 2017 PC:- 1.

The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner on telephonic instructions states that the Petitioner desires to withdraw these Petitions. She further states that written 1/2

224-WP-3492-2002.DOC instructions are awaited. She also states on telephonic instructions that the Petitioner has paid the taxes due and payable to him.

2.

Accordingly all the above Petitions disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged with no order as to costs. 3.

Hence, the pending Civil Applications do not survive and are disposed of.

( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) ( A.S. OKA, J ) 1/2