← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/693/1995compromisedconsent terms

The State Of Maharashtra v. Shri Ragho Chambharya Patil

2018-04-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka2 pages

kvm 1/2 5-FA693.95

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT FIRST APPEAL NO. 693 OF 1995 ALONGWITH CROSS OBJECTION ST. NO.31259 OF 1996 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 693 OF 1995 The State of Maharashtra ..... Appellant

VERSUS

Ragho Chambharya Patil ..... Respondent Ms.Deepa Punde, i/b. Mr.Sachin S.Punde for the Respondent. Ms.Ashwini Takalkar, A.G.P. for the State.

Ms.Ashwini Patil, Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Metro Centre No.1, Uran.

CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J., : C.D. GONGLE (RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE) & : V.R. KACHARE, (REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL-II) DATE : 22ND APRIL, 2018.

P.C.

Learned counsel appearing for the claimants, learned A.G.P. and learned counsel appearing of the respondent tenders consent terms dated 22nd April, 2018 duly signed by the respondent, learned counsel for the respondent, learned A.G.P. and the Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition, Metro Centre No.1. Consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

2.

First Appeal and Cross Objections are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. No order as to costs.

kvm 2/2 5-FA693.95 3.

Decree/award shall be drawn in terms of the consent terms only after deficit court fees if any, is deposited on the cross objections. 4.

Refund of court fees as per rules.

(V.R. KACHARE) (C.D. GONGLE) (R.D. DHANUKA, J.) REGISTRAR RETIRED DISTRICT (JUDICIAL - II) JUDGE)