Atahu Raheman Khurshid Ahmed @ Tapal v. The State Of Maharashtra

Dusane 1/2 207 apeal 395, 356.2014.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.395 OF 2014 Mohammed Mehtab Shaukat Ali ....

Appellant (Ori. Accused no.1) Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ....

Respondent ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.356 OF 2014 Atahu Raheman Khurshid Ahmed ....

Appellant @ Tapal (Ori.Accused no.2) Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ....

Respondent Mr. Mahendra M. Sandhyanshiv for the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 2014.

Mr. Anilkumar K. Patil alongwith Mr. Pankaj Pandey for the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 356 of 2014. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa APP for the State.

Coram : Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.

Date : 5th December 2018 P.C.:

Dusane 2/2 207 apeal 395, 356.2014.doc For the reasons recorded in the judgment separately, the following order is passed

O R D E R

(I) The Criminal Appeal No. 395 of 2014 stands dismissed. (II) The Criminal Appeal No. 356 of 2014 is partly allowed. The Appellant is sentenced to the period already undergone. The sentence of fine is maintained.

(Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav, J)