Trimbak Vithoba Mandlik v. Pandit Vithoba Mandlik And Another

5. SA 279 of 1994.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 279 OF 1994 Trimbak Vithoba Mandlik ...Appellant vs.

Pandit Vithoba Mandlik and Anr.

...Respondents

***** Mr. Rahul Motkari i/by Mr. V. Z. Kankaria - Advocate for the Appellant Ms. Rukmini Khairnar i/by Mr. P. N. Joshi - Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

20th JULY, 2022 P. C. :- 1.

Learned Advocate for the Appellant on the basis of oral instructions submitted that the parties have settled the dispute. 2.

Learned Advocate for the Respondents unable to confirm this fact for want of instructions.

3.

The statement made on behalf of the Appellant is accepted. The Second Appeal is disposed of as not pressed.

4.

Parties to bear on their own cost.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2022.07.22 10:58:19 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/1