← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5282/2004rule discharged

Deepak Maruti Patil And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

2017-10-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta1 pages

Shridhar Sutar 234, 235-wp-5272,5282.04.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5272 OF 2004 Shivaji Navasaji Jadhav and others ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5282 OF 2004 Deepak Maruti Patil and others ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents .....

Mr. G.H. Keluskar for the Petitioners in both Petitions. Ms. Jyoti Jadhav, AGP for the State in both Petitions. .....

CORAM :

ANOOP V. MOHTA AND MANISH PITALE, JJ.

DATE :

31st OCTOBER, 2017.

FINAL ORDER :

1.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that there was no interim relief in Petitioners' favour. Therefore, the challenge to the selection of Gramsevak in view of the pendency of litigation, becomes infructuous.

2.

Even otherwise, considering the above circumstances, we are also of the view that nothing would survive in these petitions. The Petitions are accordingly disposed of as infructuous. Rule discharged. No costs. (MANISH PITALE, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)