← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7019/2022disposed off

Ramesh Gumansingh Pawar And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2022-06-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.V. Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak2 pages

15. WP 7019 of 2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7019 OF 2022 Ramesh Gumansingh Pawar and Ors.

...Petitioners

vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

***** Adv. Sugandrao B. Deshmukh a/w Narayan G. Rokade - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. B. Kalel - AGP for the Respondent-State Mr. Sachin Gite - Advocate for Respondent No. 5. ***** CORAM :

S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE :

27th JUNE, 2022 P. C. :- 1.

Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the benefit of one time settlement scheme promulgated by Reserve Bank of India for the borrowers of the Nationalized bank is not being extended to the borrowers of the Co-operative Bank.

2.

The scheme as applicable will have to be considered. Whether the schemes are adopted by the Banks would also have to be considered by the Commissioner of Co-operation and/or Competent authority. The Petitioners may file an application/ representation to the Commissioner of Co-operation. In case SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2022.07.05 14:24:57 +0530 Seema 1/2

15. WP 7019 of 2022.doc such an application is filed, the Commissioner of Co-operation and or Competent Authority shall take decision upon the application of the Petitioner on its own merits after considering the reply of all affected parties including the Bank. The same may be decided preferably, within six months from the date of application.

3.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.] Seema 2/2