Trupti Rakesh Kolhpaur v. Rakesh Ramchandra Kolhapure

Digitally signed by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:

2024.05.09 20:55:49 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Chitra Sonawane. 1 46-IA-7510-2024inAO-174-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Interim Application No.7510 of 2024 in Appeal from Order No.174 of 2021 Trupti Rakesh Kolhapure ...

Applicant.

In the matter between:

Rakesh Ramchandra Kolhapure ...

Appellant.

Vs.

Trupti Rakesh Kolhapure ....

Respondent.

Mr Nitin Jagtap i/by Prachi Mulje for applicant in IA 7510/2024 and for respondent in AO 174/2021.

Mr Omkar Nagwekar for respondent.

Coram : R. N. Laddha, J.

Date : 8 May 2024.

P.C. :

Heard learned Counsel for the parties. The applicant/wife is respondent in the above appeal filed by the respondent/husband herein. By orders dated 21.08.2023 and 10.01.2024, the appeal was disposed of. Following compliance with the order dated 21.08.2023, the appellant/husband deposited an amount of Rs.11 lacs towards full and final settlement, with the office of this Court. 2.

Present interim application is taken out by the applicant/wife

Chitra Sonawane. 2 46-IA-7510-2024inAO-174-2021.doc to withdraw the said amount of Rs.11 lacs. However, the office has raised objection that the bank account of the applicant in HDFC Bank is standing in her maiden name i.e. Trupti Sanjay Langote, and therefore, the office could not transfer the said amount to the account of the applicant. It is submitted that the applicant/wife has already filed the affidavit-in-reply dated 08.03.2021 to the above appeal from order and in this affidavit, the applicant has mentioned both names i.e. Trupti Rakesh Kolhapure alias Trupti Sanjay Langote. In view of this, the learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the office/Registry be directed to transfer the deposited amount of Rs.11 lacs with accrued interest, if any, to the account of the applicant which is in applicant's maiden name i.e. Trupti Sanjay Langote.

3.

Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection and consented for allowing this interim application. As such, the present interim application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). [ R. N. Laddha, J. ]