The State Of Maharashtra v. Shah Fauzan Abdul Razak Shaikh

1 / 2 10-ALS-134-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.134 OF 2019 (For Leave to file Appeal) The State of Maharashtra .... Applicant (Orig. Complainant) versus Shah Fauzan Abdul Razak Shaikh .... Respondent (Orig. Accused) .......

• Ms.Veera Shinde, APP for the State.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2021 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned APP.

2.

The office noting shows that the notice is served on the Respondent. Learned APP has also filed affidavit of service. MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR 3.

I have heard learned APP. With her assistance I have MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date: 2021.08.31 16:20:01 +0530 perused the impugned Judgment and Order and in particular Nesarikar

2 / 2 10-ALS-134-19.odt the reasons given by the learned Judge from paragraph No.19 onwards.

4.

Considering the submissions made by learned APP and impugned Judgment and Order, I am of the view that the matter requires consideration. Hence the following order:

ORDER

1. Leave to file Appeal is granted.

2. Appeal is admitted.

3.

Record and proceedings be called for.

4. Action u/s 390 of Cr.P.C. be taken.

5. Appeal be numbered.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)