Rajesh Vishvanath Khamitkar v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Police Station Officer, Padgha Police Station, Thane.

1 / 2 23-REVN-95-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.95 OF 2023 Rajesh Vishwanath Khamitkar .... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra .... Respondents .......

• Mr. Shraddha Jadhav i/b. Satish R. Soni, Advocate for Petitioner.

• Mr. M. R. Tidke, APP for the State/Respondent.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 16th JUNE, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant has challenged the order dated 29/03/2023 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, below Ex.3 in Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.1139 of 2023. By the impugned order, ad-interim relief in the nature of temporary anticipatory bail was refused and that the order is challenged in this Revision Application.

Nesarikar

2 / 2 23-REVN-95-23.odt 2.

Learned counsel states that the main Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.1139 of 2023 is rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane and therefore this Revision Application has become infructuous.

3.

The statement is recorded and accepted. Revision Application is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)