Tushar Sanjay Naik v. C.S.I.R. Thr Director National Chemical Lab.

27-WP.9260.2022 jvs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9260 OF 2022 Tushar Sanjay Naik } Petitioner versus C. S. I. R., through Director } National Chemical Laboratory } Respondent Ms. Vaidehi Pradeep i/b. Mr. Vinod P.

Sangvikar for the petitioner.

Mr. K. P. Anilkumar with Mr. Chinmay Apte for the respondent.

CORAM:

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE:

FEBRUARY 16, 2023 P.C.:

1.

We have heard the learned advocate for the petitioner. 2.

The learned advocate for the respondent submits that the petitioner has remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

3.

Certainly, we would not have entertained the writ petition on merits as the petitioner has remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

4.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that a representation of the petitioner is pending with the respondent. The same be directed to be decided.

5.

In case the representation filed by the petitioner is pending with respondent with regard to compassionate appointment, then, the same shall be decided on its own merits in accordance SALUNKE J V with law and policy, expeditiously, preferably within three by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.02.17 14:58:34 +0530 months.

27-WP.9260.2022 6.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)