← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/813/2019allowed to be withdrawn

Harish Laxmichand Sanghwi And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

2021-02-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal2 pages

1 / 2 2 ABA 813-2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 813 OF 2019

1. Harish Laxmichand Sanghwi

2. Rahul Harish Sanghwi

3. Manoj Nandlal Burad ... Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

Mr. Vivek Arote i/b. Mr. Piyush R. Toshnival, for the Applicants. Smt. A. A. Takalkar, APP for State-Respondent. .....

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 11th FEBRUARY, 2021 P.C. :

.

The applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R.No.I 11/2019 dated 19th July 2019 registered at Dindori Police Station, Dist. Nashik under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code. 2.

Today, the learned APP, on instructions, and on the basis of the report sent to the Public Prosecutor' s office by the Manjusha

2 / 2 2 ABA 813-2019.odt Investigating Officer makes a statement that the Investigating Agency has filed 'C' Summary Report in this case. The statement is accepted.

3.

In view of this statement, learned Counsel for the applicants does not press this application.

4.

In view of this, the application is disposed of as not pressed by the applicants.

5.

However, it is clarified that if in future, in connection with the same offence, the Investigating Agency thinks it fit to arrest the applicants for any reason whatsoever, the Investigating Agency shall give 72 hours clear working days' notice to the applicants to enable them to approach the appropriate Court for proper remedy. With these observations, the application is disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)