Rakesh Girdharilal Gajera v. Union Of India And ANR.

912 wp 1784-19 II.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1784 OF 2019 Rakesh Girdharilal Gajera

...Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & Anr.

...Respondents

Adv. Amit Desai Senior Advocate a/w. Adv. Pranav Badheka a/w. Adv. Rohan Dakshini, Adv. Pooja Kothari, Ms. Ashna Contractor, Ms. Arushi Dubey i/b. Rashmikat & Partners for the petitioner. Adv. H.S. Venegaonkar for CBI.

Adv. S.R. Agarkar, APP for State.

CORAM :

S. S. SHINDE, J DATE :

31st July 2019 P.C.

1.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, erstwhile Advocate on record in the present petition has not stated true and relevant facts and also did not place on record relevant documents. Learned senior counsel expresses regret on behalf of the erstwhile Advocate on record for his failure to place on record true and relevant facts and documents. He prays for withdrawal of the writ petition, with liberty to agitate the contentions raised in the present petition, in the appropriate proceedings. Learned senior counsel also submits that, none of the Advocates appearing in Writ Petition No. 3599 of 2019 were concerned with the filing of present writ petition. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for allowing the petitioner to withdraw the present petition. Bhagyawant This order is corrected pursuant to the speaking to the minutes of order dated 05.08.2019. 1 of 2

912 wp 1784-19 II.doc 3.

In the light of discussion made herein above, petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of as such, with liberty to agitate the contentions raised in the present petition on merits in appropriate proceedings. [S. S. SHINDE , J] Bhagyawant This order is corrected pursuant to the speaking to the minutes of order dated 05.08.2019. 2 of 2