Chandar Aarmogam Naikar v. The State Of Maharashtra

15.ba842.15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 842 OF 2015 Chandar Aarmogam Naikar.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Ms. Shweta Nijhawan, advocate for Applicant.

Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : JULY 8, 2015 P.C.:

It appears that this application has wrongly been placed before this Court. The learned Counsel appointed for the applicant submits that the applicant has been convicted by the Sessions Court vide Judgment and Order dated 20/1/2009 for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. That the applicant has preferred an appeal which is pending before the Hon'ble Division Bench. It is stated in the application that the applicant has engaged an advocate to espouse the cause in appeal. In view of this, prayers Talwalkar 1/2

15.ba842.15.sxw in the present application would become infructuous. The application being sans merit, stands dismissed. This Court appreciates the efforts taken by the learned Counsel so appointed. The professional fees is quantified at Rs. 1000/- to be paid to Ms. Shweta Nijhawan, Advocate within 3 months from today. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2