Smt Muratidevi Ramgirish Rajbhar v. Smt Chaturi Videshi Rajbhar

15.IA.1673.21.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1673 OF 2021 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION (ST) NO.9909 OF 2021 Digitally signed by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date:

2022.07.26 10:16:11 +0530 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Smt. Muratidevi Ramgirish Rajbhar ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Smt. Muratidevi Ramgirish Rajbhar ..Applicant

Versus

Smt. Chaturi Videshi Rajbhar and Ors.

..Respondents Mr. Sujit Mashal i/by Nashikwala law ofoce, for the Applicant.

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 25th JULY, 2022 P.C.

1.

None appears for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. As far as respondent No.1 is concerned, I am informed that service on said respondent is effected through paper publication and afodavit of service is placed on records. As contentions in the application for condonation of delay are not controverted and for the reasons disclosed in the application, same stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) subject to payment of cost of Rs.3,000/- to be deposited with the Kirtikar Law Library.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] BGP.