Khan Mohammed Arif And ANR. v. Heena Abdul Farhan Shaikh

16-AO-388-2021.doc Shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.388 2021 A/W INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3195 OF 2021 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.388 2021 Khan Mohammed Arif and another.

] Appellants Vs.

Heena Abdul Farhan Shaikh ] Respondent .....

Mr. Vivek Shukla and Ms. Pooja M. i/b Shukla & Association, for Appellants.

Mr. B.G. Tangsali i/b Mr. Ajay Tripathi, for Respondent. .....

CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATED : 14th JULY, 2022.

P.C.

1.

Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the appellant, on instructions, submits that subject premises has been vacated today and it' s physical possession has been delivered. Statement is accepted. 2.

In view of the above, nothing survives in the Appeal from Order. Hence, it stands disposed of. There is no order as to costs. 3.

In view of disposal of Appeal from order, pending Interim Application stands disposed of.

4.

Liberty is granted to the learned Counsel for the appellant to prosecute his remedy before the trial Court as regards compensation. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2022.07.16 16:39:41 +0530