Akhilesh Badriprasad Upadhyay v. The State Of Maharashtra

2 APPA 547 OF 2016.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.547 OF2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.900 OF 2012 Akhilesh Badriprasad Upadhyay .... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Nitin Sejpal, for the Applicant.

Mrs. G. P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 2nd DECEMBER, 2016.

P.C. :

1.

This application is preferred for bail during pendency of appeal.

2.

Heard learned counsel Mr. Sejpal, appearing for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant makes statement that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has expedited the hearing of this appeal and therefore, he is not pressing this application for bail. Statement is accepted.

4.

In view of above statement, application is disposed of as not 1/2

2 APPA 547 OF 2016.doc pressed.

5.

The hearing of appeal is expedited and the Registry is directed to place this appeal for final hearing in a week commencing from 16.01.2017.

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE,J.] 2/2