← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11377/2016disposed off

Balkrishna Sitaram Lad v. Sakharam Sitaram Lad And ORS.

2018-11-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated2 pages

904.11377.16-wp.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11377/2016 Balkrishna Sitaram Laad ... Petitioner V/s.

Sakharam Sitaram Lad & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Bhushan Walimbe for the Petitioner

CORAM:

K.K. TATED, J.

DATED :

NOVEMBER 30, 2018 P.C. :

Heard. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner challenges the order dated 07.03.2016 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division Devgad, Dist. Sindhudurg at Oros in Regular Civil Suit No. 46/2006 whereby the question posed by the Defendant while conducting the cross-examination of the Plaintiff was rejected. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that during pendency of the Writ Petition, the Regular Civil Suit itself has been decreed in favour of the Petitioner on 01.09.2016. To that effect, he has given in writing. Same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

In view of the subsequent development that the said suit is decreed in favour of the Petitioner on 01.09.2016 nothing Basavraj G. Patil 1/2

904.11377.16-wp.doc survives in the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs. (K. K. TATED, J.) Basavraj G. Patil 2/2