Claudio Joseph Rego And ANR. v. Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical Ltd

1/1 LPA/33/2014 BDPPS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.33 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1925 OF 2011 Claudio Joseph Rego & Anr.

.... Appellants.

V/s Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceutical ..... Respondents.

---- Mr. S.K. Shinde i/b Ms. Prabha Badadare for the Appellants. Mr. Vijay Vaidya with Mr. Ashish Belge i/b Salgaonkar & Co. for the Respondents.

---- CORAM: V. M. KANADE & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE: 6th April, 2016 P.C.:- 1.

We have perused the impugned order. We find that no reasons have been given by the learned Single Judge for dismissing the Petition, apart from saying that lower Courts have given concurrent findings.

2.

The impugned order is therefore set aside and the matter is remanded to the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge may decide it on merits and in accordance with law. 3.

Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (M.S. KARNIK, J. ) (V.M. KANADE, J.)