← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5499/2023disposed off

Khan Amina Khatun (Jain Ambe Hardware) Decd. Thr Lrs v. Tahsildar 2(Special Cell) Slum Rehabilitation Autohirty And ORS

2023-04-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal2 pages

41-wp-5499-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5499 OF 2023 Khan Amina Khatun (Jai Ambe Hardware) (Deceased) Through Khan Farhan Ahmed Ajaz Ahmed (Son) ..Petitioner

Versus

Tahsildar-2 (Special Cell) & Ors.

..Respondents __________ Ms. Archana Gaikwad for Petitioner.

Mr. Shahajirao R. Shinde a/w. Chandni Sachade for Respondent/AGRC.

Mr. Balsara i/b. Sneha Dedhiya for Respondent No.5. __________ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 17 APRIL 2023 PC :

1.

In this petition, the Petitioner has challenged the orders dated 12/01/2023 and 20/02/2023 passed by the Respondent No.1 Tahsildar-2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has challenged these orders before the Respondent No.3Apex Grievances Redressal Committee, however, the Committee is not holding their sitting in this week. She submitted that the Petitioner be given a fair chance to put her grievance before the said committee.

Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2023.04.20 10:36:18 +0530 VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Gokhale

41-wp-5499-23 2.

Learned counsel for the Respondent No.5 very fairly states that, directions be issued to the Respondent No.3 to decide the Petitioner's grievance on the very next day when the Respondent No.3 will be taking up her matter. 3.

Considering these submissions made before me today, the Respondent No.3 is directed to give notice to the Petitioner as to when her matter will be decided. Once such notice is served, the Respondent No.3 shall decide the Petitioner'

s Appeal No.78 of 2023 at the earliest.

4.

Till the Appeal is decided by the Respondent No.3, no coercive steps shall be taken against the Petitioner. 5.

With these observations, the petition is disposed of. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)