Fatima Najmuddin Atthar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

rsk 1 24-WP-6060-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6060 OF 2018 Fatima Najmuddin Atthar

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

------- Mr. B. K. Mishra a/w. Mr. R. V. Singh for the Petitioner. Mr. V. S. Gokhale, 'B' Panel counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 6-State. -------

CORAM

:

NITIN JAMDAR & SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATED :

12 SEPTEMBER 2022.

P. C. :

The prayer of the Petitioner is to direct Respondent to make entries in revenue record showing the Petitioner as the owner which prayer is based on the communication by the District Collector, Thane dated 6 June 2002 to the State Government. 2.

The grievance of the Petitioner is that inspite of this by RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Date:

2022.09.21 15:30:27 +0530 RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE communication, no steps are being taken to implement the communication dated 6 June 2002. Without commenting as to whether the communication dated 6 June 2002 is an effective order or

rsk 2 24-WP-6060-18.doc only a proposal, an appropriate course of action for the Petitioner is to bring to the notice of the District Collector that this communication is not being taken forward. Once such a grievance is made to the said Collector, the Collector can look into the grievance. 3.

The Petitioner is permitted to pursue the matter before the Collector. If the Collector finds that the order needs to be implemented, considering the time span for which the Petitioner is waiting, the Collector will take necessary steps expeditiously. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)