Nitin Motilal Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra

Mhi 1 BA-855-16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 855 OF 2016 Nitin Motilal Jain ...

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...

Respondent Mr. Amin Solkar i/b. Ms. Falguni Brahmbhatt,Advocate for the applicant. Mrl. Makrand Kale a/w Ms. Jyoti Taware i/b. Mr. Ravi Dwivedi for respondent No.2.

Ms. J.S.Lohokare, APP, for the State.

CORAM:

SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.

DATE : 14th February, 2017.

P.C.

The learned counsel appearing for the complainant has submitted before the Court that she appears for the complainant in the trial Court. The trial has commenced and the substantive evidence of the complainant has been recorded. It would not be appropriate to consider an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. Hence, the application stands disposed of.

2.

The learned Magistrate seized with RCC No.133/PW/2016 shall make an endeavour to conclude the recording of substantive evidence, as far as possible within six months from the date of receipt of this order. The learned Magistrate shall ensure that the accused is produced before the

Mhi 2 BA-855-16.sxw Court on each and every date and upon failure shall take appropriate action. 3.

Office to communicate this order to the concerned Court forthwith.

(SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)