Pooja Vishal Bankar v. Vishal Chandrakant Bankar

(28) MCA-122-20.doc BDP-SPS Bharat D.

Pandit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by Bharat D.

Pandit Date:

2021.02.11 09:33:42 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.122 OF 2020 Pooja Vishal Bankar ..... Applicant.

V/s Vishal Chandrakant Bankar ...... Respondent.

Mr. Suvidh S. Kulkarni i/b Mr. Abhishek Kulkarni for the Applicant. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 2021 P.C.:- 1] Applicant is a custodian of a child aged about 5 years. Considering the distance between Pune and Nashik, prayer for transfer of proceedings in terms of prayer clause (B) appears to be justified, as applicant will suffer more hardship.

2] Apart from above, non-applicant, though served, has chosen not to appear before this Court.

3] As such, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 1/1