Manoj Namdeo Gajkosh v. The State Of Maharashtra

rsk 1/2 904-BA-955-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.955 OF 2017 Manoj Namdeo Gajakosh ...Applicanr vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

---- Mr. Prashant G. Pandey for the Applicant.

Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent. ---- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATE : 6th October, 2017 P.C.:

.

This is a subsequent Bail Application. Earlier Application filed by the present Applicant bearing No.2200/2014 was withdrawn before this Court.

2.

It was submitted by the learned APP that at that stage charge is framed on 9/5/2013. This Court had expedited the trial by order dated 24/10/2014.

3.

Mr. Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant has placed on record the roznama of Sessions Case No.548/2012 . It appears that the Court was vacant on the last date. However, now the matter is assigned to Court Room No.17. This is the matter which was investigated by DCB CID. The learned counsel for the Applicant vehemently submits that the Applicant cannot be subjected to indefinite incarceration and therefore it is prayed that the Applicant be enlarged on bail. However, taking into consideration the seriousness of the matter and the fact that the original accused No.1 is convicted in another case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail. However, since the charge is framed 4 years ago, this Court is inclined to expedite the trial. The learned Court Room

rsk 2/2 904-BA-955-17.doc No.17 is hereby requested to make efforts to conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible by the end of 30/11/2018. 4.

Application stands disposed of.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)