← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4144/2021disposed off

Aqueel-Ur-Rahman S/O Mohammad Hanifmomin v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2023-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. W. Chandwani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4144 OF 2021 Aqueel-Ur-Rahman S/o. Mohammad Hanif Momin .. Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra, Through the Principal Secretary (UD-I), Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.

.. Respondents Mr. S.N. Biradar, i/by Mr. Yash Sonawane, for the Petitioner. Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.W. CHANDWANI, J.J.

TH JANUARY, 2023.

DATE : 9 P.C. :

1.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for respondent no.1-State. Nobody appears for respondent nos.2 and 3.

2.

Respondent nos.2 and 3 are the officers of Pune Municipal Corporation. They have not filed any reply to this petition, although they have been duly served with the notice issued by this court. Sufficient time has already been granted to respondent nos.2 and 3, but no reply has been filed by anyone of them. The main ground raised in this petition, regarding passing of the 1/2 18-WP-4144-2021-Corrected Order Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt. 12-01-2023.doc Dixit

impugned order dated 10 th July 2019 by respondent no.3 without application of mind and without considering the reply filed by the petitioner, is not disputed by respondent no.3.

3.

In view of the above, we find that the impugned order dated 10 th July 2019 cannot be sustained in the eyes of law and it must go. Accordingly, we pass the following order :- (i) Petition is partly allowed and the impugned order dated th July 2019 is hereby quashed and set aside. (ii) Respondent nos.2 and 3 are directed to decide the application of the petitioner afresh, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of appearance of the petitioner before respondent no.3.

(iii) Petitioner to appear before respondent no.3 on 16 th January 2023.

4.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms. Writ Petition is disposed of. [ M.W. CHANDWANI, J. ] [ SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J. ] 2/2 Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date:

2023.01.16 14:14:50 +0530 Dixit SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT 18-WP-4144-2021-Corrected Order Pursuant to Speaking to Minutes Order dt. 12-01-2023.doc