Dr. Binoj Thomas Manjaly And ANR v. Dr. Mary George Mandapathil And ANR

Ethape 1 505-IA-1916-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 230 OF 2022 Dr. Binoj Thomas Manjaly and Anr.

Applicants

Versus

Dr. Mary George Mandapathil and Anr.

Respondents Ms. Hiteeksha Doshi a/w Parul Vedak advocate for applicants.

Ms. Shilpa Joshi advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. A. R. Patil, APP for respondent /State.

by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date:

2022.09.23 12:35:14 +0530 CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2022 PC :

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Learned advocate representing both the sides jointly submitted that parties have settled the dispute and executed consent terms. Consent terms were fled in the Family Court Appeal No. 98 of 2018. Hence, the present application may be disposed of.

3.

In view of submission, revision application stand disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)