Ghulam Panjatan Khan And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

25.aba.741-18 & anr.doc Bhogale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.741 OF 2018 Yousuf Khan .. Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.725 OF 2018 Ghulam Panjatan Khan and ors.

.. Applicants vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent -------------------- Mr. Abhishek Yende I/b. Mohammad Qais Shakil Ahmed for the Applicants.

Mr. N.B. Patil, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Tariq Khan for Respondent No.2-Original complainant. Ms. Shital Jadhav, Police Sub-Inspector, Ghatkopar Police Station, Mumbai is present.

-------------------- CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.

DATE : JULY 12, 2021 (THROUGH V.C.) P.C.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicants, learned APP for the Respondent-State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant.

2.

Learned APP submitted a report of the Police Sub-Inspector, Ghatkopar Police Station, Mumbai stating that a 'B' summary has

25.aba.741-18 & anr.doc been fled before the concerned Court as the investigation did not reveal any substance in the allegations made by the complainant. The said report dated 05.07.2021 tendered by the learned APP is taken on record and marked as Exhibit 'X-1' for identifcation. 3.

In this view of the matter, learned counsel for the Applicants submits that as nothing now survives for consideration in this Anticipatory Bail Applications in view of the fling of the 'B' summary report, the Anticipatory Bail Applications may be disposed of as not pressed at this stage. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of as not pressed in view of the fling of the 'B' summary report. Liberty to apply is kept open.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.)