Mariyam Alahuddin Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date:

2023.04.17 14:37:03 +0530 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV 31.aba1033.23.doc sHI Shiv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1033 OF 2023 Mr. Mohammad Ayud Indaj Ali Khan ...Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1364 OF 2023 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1033 OF 2023 In the matter between Mariyam Alahuddin Khan ...Applicant/Intervener Mr. Mohammad Ayud Indaj Ali Khan ...Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Junayana Kashid with Mr. Vishwa Patil i/b Vedchetan Patil for the Applicant.

Mr. A. R. Kapadnia APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Sunny Punamiya i/b Mr. Rajesh Shukla for the Applicant in IA No.1364/2023.

CORAM :S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED :13TH APRIL 2023 P. C. :

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1033 OF 2023 1.

As learned Advocate Shri Vedchetan Patil is not available today, adjournment is sought. It is submitted that connected matter is kept 1/2

31.aba1033.23.doc sHI on 17th April 2023. Whereas according to learned Advocate for the first informant that matter is not connected to this matter. These issues can be gone into when the matter will be heard. 2.

Matter be kept on 17th April 2023, with connected matter. Interim Application No.1364/2023.

3.

The first informant want to intervene in this matter. 4.

It is opposed by learned Advocate for the Applicant. The law is settled. The intervention is allowed.

5.

The first informant is at liberty to file compilation of documents by supplying it to other side.

6.

Let learned Advocate for the Applicant to supply copy of said Application to learned Advocate for the complainant. 7.

Interim Application is disposed of accordingly. [S. M. MODAK, J.] 2/2