Kamlesh Mahadeo Oze And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

50-cr-wp-3884-21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

DINESH SADANAND SHERLA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3884 OF 2021 DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date: 2022.07.12 14:17:08 +0500 Kamlesh M. Oze and anr.

... Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra and anr.

... Respondents ---------------- Mr. P. L. Gajbhiye a/w. Ms Parvathy Iyer for the Petitioners. Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. M.D. Pol for the Respondent No.2.

----------------

CORAM

:

NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

8 JULY 2022.

P.C.

.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the Respondent No.2/ Complainant state that the FIR be quashed by consent of the Respondent No.2 /Complainant.

2.

The learned APP points out that the FIR not only states about the allegations against the Respondent No.2/Complainant but also states that the bogus and fraudulent notarized documents were produced during the hearing of bail application and the Court was also mislead and therefore, this is not a case where FIR can be quashed by consent of the Respondent No.2/Complainant. We agree with this submission. It is open to the Petitioner, if so advised, Dinesh Sherla 1/2

50-cr-wp-3884-21.doc to seek quashing of FIR on merits, which application will be considered on its own merits.

3.

Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Dinesh Sherla 2/2