Arjun Shrirang Nawadkar v. Satish Tukaram Pisal ANR ANR

S.S.Kilaje 50-IA-8090-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8090 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2012 Arjun Shrirang Nawadkar ... Applicant

IN THE MATTER OF :

Arjun Shrirang Nawadkar ... Appellant

Versus

Satish Tukaram Pisal and Anr.

...Respondent

.........

Mr. Sangramsinh S. Yadav, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. Urmila K. Sanil, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 29th APRIL, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel applicant and reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and disposed of. 3.

The applicant to take necessary steps within four weeks. 4.

The Applicant is not entitled for interest for the delayed period of 7 years 298 days if applicant succeeds in appeal. 5.

The appeal is restored to file.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2024.04.30 14:21:54 +0530 SONALI SATISH KILAJE 1/1