Jawahar Nadar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

9__appln_245_2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 245 of 2015 Jawahar Nadar & Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Respondents.

------ Applicant No.1 Mr. Jawahar Nadar, present.

Mr. Rajesh More APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED :5th MAY, 2015.

P.C.

Heard Applicant No.1 in-person and learned APP for Respondent No.1-State. I have gone through the prayer clause. Attendance of Respondent No.2 is not necessary to decide the prayer. 2.

Admitted. Heard finally.

3.

This application is for extension of time limit to dispose of the case No.11/PS/2009 pending in the Court of the Magistrate. Similar prayer made by the Applicants has been rejected by the Court earlier. I am, therefore, not inclined to entertain the application. megha Page No.1 of 2

9__appln_245_2015.doc 4.

However, the learned Magistrate is at liberty to pray for extension, if he is not able to decide the case within the time limit fixed by this Court.

5.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(JUDGE) megha Page No.2 of 2