Naresh Kishanchand Chandiramani And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra

S S KADAM 25-wp-2345-2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2345 OF 2023 Pravin Basant Totlani ... Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents with CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2331 OF 2023 Naresh Kishanchand Chandiramani & Anr.

... Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents with CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 2819 OF 2023 Ashutosh Naresh Chandiramani ... Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Bhojwani along with Mr.Naresh Parihar for Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for Respondent-State.

Mr. Zaheer Khan Pathan i/b Zaid & Qureshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND SHIVKUMAR DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 17th AUGUST, 2023.

P.C. :

1.

Husband (Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2819 of 2023),father-in-law, Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2023.08.21 17:38:16 +0530 mother-in-law and sister-in-law (Petitioners in Writ Petition No.2331 of 1/2 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM

S S KADAM 25-wp-2345-2023.doc 2023) and brother-in-law (Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2345 of 2023) of Respondent No.2 have filed Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing R.C.C.No.1650 of 2022 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pimpri, District Pune, arising out of C.R.No. 674 of 2022 dated 14th August 2022 registered with Pimpri Police Station, PimpriChinchwad Police Commissionerate, District Pune, under Sections 498-A, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 27 and 30 of Arms Act with the consent of Respondent No.2. 2.

Learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 submitted that, she has filed separate Affidavits dated 27th July 2023 in the above mentioned three Petitions. It is stated in paragraph No.2 thereof that, Respondent No.2 and Petitioner in Writ Petition No.2819 of 2023 have restituted their matrimonial relations. That, their disputes inter se have been amicably settled. In paragraph No.4 thereof, she has given her no objection for quashing of the crime in question.

Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and through her Advocate reiterates the contents of her Affidavits dated 27th July 2023 and her 'no objection' for quashing of the crime in question. 3.

In view of the above, Petitions are allowed in terms of prayer clause (i).

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2