Shivram Pichaya Pallar v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

ba.875.2015_918.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.875 OF 2015 Shivram Pichaya Pallar ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr.R.P. Suve for the Applicant Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent - State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: JULY 1, 2015 P.C.:

1.

This application is for bail. The learned Counsel for the applicant/accused as also the learned Prosecutor submit that in February, 2015, 11 witnesses were examined and the trial is already commenced. However, the grievance made by the learned Counsel for the applicant/accused is that since February, 2015, there is no progress in the matter. In view of this, as the applicant/accused is facing charges under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and other charges and as the trial is already commenced, it is appropriate that the matter is expedited and the trial Court takes it up on a day to day basis. As the case is part heard, I am not inclined to grant bail.

1 / 2

ba.875.2015_918.doc 2.

Accordingly, the matter is disposed of without going into the merits. However, the trial Court shall take up the case on a day to day basis and dispose it off as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Registry to forward a copy of this order to the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Alibag.

(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2