Shri. Anand Pralhad Kale v. Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Through Secretary And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5731 OF 2003 Balasaheb Abaji Khopade Petitioner V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3427 OF 2009 Nilima Sadanand Vartak & ors.
Petitioners V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2885 OF 2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3427 OF 2009 Balasaheb Abaji Khopde Applicant V/s.
Nilima Sadanand Vartak & ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3535 OF 2012 Shri Nilesh Suresh Tapase & ors.
Petitioners v/s.
Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Through Secretary & ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4111 OF 2012 Shri Anand Pralhad Kale Petitioner v/s.
Maharashtra Public Service Commission, Through Secretary & ors.
Respondents ----- Kiran Kawre 1/3
None for the Petitioner.
Smt. N. M. Mehra, AGP a/w Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. for the Respondent/State. ----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC :
1.
Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court. No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.
Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners Kiran Kawre 2/3
to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.
4.
Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.
5.
Civil Application also stands disposed of.
(FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA,J) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 3/3