← Library
Bombay High CourtALP/154/2016others disposed off

Pratap @ Prakash Kripadas Chugh (Since Deceased Through His Legal Heirs) Naina Pratap Chugh And An v. Deepa Jethanand Rohira And ANR

2018-02-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik2 pages

rpa 1/2 alp-154-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.154 OF 2016 (For Leave to Appeal) IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2014 Pratap alias Prakash Kripaldas Chugh (Since deceased through his LRs) .. Applicants 1A) Naina Pratap Chugh & Ors.

Vs.

Deepa Jethanand Rohira & Anr.

.. Respondents ......

Mr.Anilkumar K. Patil, Advocate for the Applicants. None for Respondent No.1.

Ms.N.S. Jain, APP for the Respondent - State. ......

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATED :

FEBRUARY 23, 2018.

P.C. :

This is an application seeking leave to file an appeal against the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court. The applicant is the original complainant. The cheque issued by the respondent-accused for an amount of Rs.31,00,000/-, was dishonoured. Trial Court has accepted the defence of the accused that blank cheque has been handed over to the complainant which was allegedly misused. Learned advocate for the applicants submitted that the accused have not rebutted presumption under

rpa 2/2 alp-154-16.doc Section 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Admittedly, the cheque was signed by the accused and the defence of the accused was not established. The accused did not examine herself in support of her defence.

Arguable questions are raised in this application which requires grant of leave to file an Appeal against acquittal. :: O R D E R ::

(i) Leave granted;

(ii) Admit;

(iii) Call for record and proceedings.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)