Datta Shrirang Mane v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

16-wp-2030-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2030 OF 2021 Datta Shrirang Mane

...Petitioner

vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Pradeep Havnur, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Thakre, P.P. and Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for the State. Mr.D.P. Singh, for Respondent No. 4.

CORAM :

S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE :

JUNE 11, 2021 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) P.C.:

.

Heard Mr. Havnur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Thakre, learned Public Prosecutor for the State. 2.

In the order dated 1st June, 2021, this Court had recorded that 'Y' category security consisting of C.R.P.F. personnel has been provided to Mr. Aadar Poonawalla. In addition, two State police personnel have been detailed for the security of Mr. Poonawalla. On that day, Mr. Thakre, learned public prosecutor, had sought time to take instructions as regards the enhanced security cover which may be required to be provided to Mr. Adar Poonawalla.

Vishal Parekar 1/2

16-wp-2030-2021.doc 3.

Mr. Thakre, on instructions, submits that as and when Mr. Adar Poonawalla lands in India and depending upon the desire of Mr. Poonawalla and the security requirement, the State would provide adequate level of security to Mr. Poonawalla. 4.

In view of the aforesaid statement, we are of the view that the petition, which is primarily based on news reports, does not deserve to be entertained any further.

5.

The petition, therefore, stands disposed of.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2