Satish Chamanlal Kamra v. Vipinchand M. Jain And ANR

Rane * 1/2 * REVN-210-2015.doc (sr. no.906) Friday,5.2.2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 210 OF 2015 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 198 OF 2015 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 525 OF 2015 Mr. Satish Chamanlal Kamra .......Applicant V/s.

1. Mr. Vipinchand M. Jain and anr.

.......Respondent * * * * * * Mr. Rishi Bhuta, Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. Priyanka Mishra h/f. Mr. Anil Agarwal, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Ms. S.V. Gajare, APP for State, respondent no.2. Coram :- Coram :- Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.

Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.

5th th February, 2016.

February, 2016.

P.C. :- P.C. :- 1).

Both the Advocates state that the dispute in the Revision Application relating to the offence punishable under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act is settled between the parties. In that circumstance, leave is granted to the parties to compound the offence and the Revision Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). 2).

Both the Advocates also state that, the amount of Rs.60,000/- deposited by the applicant in the Sessions Court in Criminal Appeal No.

Rane * 2/2 * REVN-210-2015.doc (sr. no.906) Friday,5.2.2016 449 of 2012 is agreed to be withdrawn by respondent no.1. Respondent no.1 is accordingly at liberty to withdraw that amount. 2).

In view of disposal of the Revision Application, Criminal Application No. 198 of 2015 and Criminal Application No. 525 of 2015 do not survive. The same are accordingly disposed off. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J) (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)