Mr. Vinay Dhirajlal Mehta And ORS v. Smt. Smita Mayur Kapadia And ORS

36. ao 1-21 & caa.doc Diksha Rane

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by DIKSHA DINESH RANE Date:

2022.09.19 19:49:38 +0530 DIKSHA DINESH RANE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION ST.NO. 11241 OF 2019 VINAY DHIRAJLAL MEHTA & ORS.

..APPELLANTS/ APPLICANTS VS.

SMITA MAYUR KAPADIA & ORS.

..RESPONDENTS ------------ Mr. Sushil Upadhyay i/b. A. M. Saraogi for the appellants/applicants.

Mr. Aditya A. Kavale i/b. Zohair H. Zaidy for respondent nos. 1 & 3.

------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 19, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants/applicants. 2.

After arguing the matter for some time and inviting my attention to the impugned order, having regard to the nature of the reliefs sought in the Notices of Motion which led to the passing of the impugned order, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he may be permitted to file a fresh Notice of Motion for appropriate interim reliefs. 3.

Liberty is granted.

36. ao 1-21 & caa.doc 4.

If such a Notice of Motion is filed, the same shall be considered on its own merits, without being influenced by the observations made in the impugned order.

5.

With this liberty, the appeal is disposed of. 6.

The Civil Applications are also disposed of.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.)